Communication Style Paper

AA professor Course 6315 Feb 26, 2013 COMMUNICATION STYLES ANALYSIS OF THE INTERACTION This paper analyzes a item fundamental interaction. The purpose is to see how changing the communication appearance according to the subjects gnarled can have different out watch overs. The disciplines covered in this paper atomic number 18 (1) Subjects Involved, (2) The Specific Interaction and Analysis, and (3) mop up. Subjects Involved The nature of the two subjects involved in the study makes the analysis interesting due to their opposite communication styles. each miscommunication between the two can result in undesired outcomes.The next paragraphs describe the two subjects and their communication styles followed by the discussion of the particular interaction and its analysis. Subject 1 The Candidate Sales Manager The one intimacy that separates the Sales Manager, Brian, from everyone else in the office is his desire to be liked by everyone. Brian cannot handle rejection of any kind . He is the soulfulness to approve any changes in Sales recommendations to the investors. Convincing Brian to do anything other than what he wants is quite a task. Each time one is about to convince Brian, something magically appears that takes him away(predicate) to a different task.Subject II The Noble Me I am the endorse subject. Being a Noble, getting into long discussions over rather refined forward issues is difficult for me. Arguments ar pretty simple for me. The solution is each this or that. I have a need to make a decision and move on to the next task with the least numerate of time wasted. The Specific Interaction and Analysis Brian has been the Sales Manager for the destruction five years. The office environment is open and democratic. All important issues are discussed in hebdomadal friday morning meetings.Agendas for monday morning sales meetings are finalized on friday along with the recommendations for different investment properties to be presented to the i nvestors the following week. In the weekly discussions, Brians job is to listen to the recommendations of the Sales Team which is led by me. Every time, when we need to finalize the recommendation, the discussions get heated and Brian just changes the topic and starts discussing something else. Each week, we end up with an argument trying to convince each other of the investment pick of the week, without climax to an agreement.Every argument leads to Brian discussing a completely different topic. It became a real problem for the sales team, as we leave the meeting without a clear understanding of to present to our investors in the coming week. Once I understood Brians communication style, I discussed our lean of action with my team. Under no circumstances were we to start an argument. Our tone of portion was to remain calm and in control at all times. We offered our views as an alternative without trying to direct or control him. The discussions were longer than what I would hav e liked but the results were ncouraging. After weeks of unclear outcomes, we were able to come up with clear investment recommendations for our sales team to present to our investors. Conclusion I learned that knowing the other persons style of communication makes the communication process a little easier. I forever and a day knew about the differences among people but never gave it the required thought to serve up me communicate better. I now alter my communication style depending upon the person I am dealing with resulting in more effective communication.