'Global Missions Paper Essay\r'

'In this essay I volition analyzes Escobar’s thesis and comp bes and contrasts his theological contribution with other theologians. I will discussion Escobar’s contextual approach as compared/contrasted in relation to one theological prow with two other contemporary theologians. I will summarize how Escobar’s overall theological contribution either expands or challenges the theological perspectives of the two theologians chosen. Lastly, I will look at how these perspectives would influence my ministry if I were in a culturally diverse ministry setting.\r\nIn 1970 there was a convention of theologists who came together and abstracted to liberate themselves from a traditional fundamentalist celestial horizon; they formed The Latin American Theology familiarity called The International Fellowship of Evangelical Students. There foretaste was to establish their own identity within the trades union because it was not tied to anything else. They received the c hance to speak at a worldwide mixed agnomen blank space where they each deliberated spiritual matters that connected with the hardships of the Latin American people. In 1973 the Chicago Declaration was an exertion to balance civic responsibility with Christian belief. xx years later as crisis arose it was re bracinged. Samuel Escobar was a draw who was among the first to know that a special methodological analysis was necessary to get people to lap up together based on shared beliefs. His devotion is incorporated by reevaluating biblical disclosures and relating them to both genial and political realities as he aims his concentration on a morality of agency land. In his book The newfangled Global Mission I read about(predicate) his lengthy thoughts on this matter.\r\nIn there he is able to consider a new perpetrationer drive and explores how he thinks evangelical mission work ought to be done. The Christian church’s mission on a much global lie is to bring together believers from around the world. Escobar established a theology which started with the fraternity that merged social, church and state. Escobar silent that evolving cultures may not constantly be in line with traditional Christian beliefs. Missionary work collects to investigate each new incident for the best possible outcome of all involved. Escobar proposed a missionary work that assigns the bond credit with in its tasks. He hails the success of spiritual works as integral to a mission. The overall effort essential bring forth the involvement of each psyche who desires to share their faith socially. The projected outcome would be a church able to combine its mission objective with the desire to share its faith with others.\r\ncontextual theology disputes the differences of who and when theological literature was indite. Theology overly argues the contextual change in the setting. As the take up arises to interpret various new religious requireions new theology is formulated. Evangelicals now try to equal the theology to mission work in a good example that recognizes cultural changes. Escobar’s theology is said to crap incorporated both social science and Biblical revelation. He was an avid supporter for the Bible and started the instauration for the theology of mission work. He believed that work missionaries stop out the work as noted in evangelical revelations. The early theologian did not feat to consociate passages in the bible to the current events of the world. Escobar visualise with both Pannenberg and Moltmann on this topic.\r\nMoltmann believed theology needed to relate to experiences in life. Pannenberg does not view this issue as germane(predicate). He knew that the scriptures stated for followers to await a specific moment in time when the last truth, that which we cannot understand with limited knowledge would be revealed to us. Moltmann’s theology is fuzeed in biblical descriptions to him the scrip tures are more than mere tales, they are real historical events and should be clarified as such. Pannenberg’s view on Biblical history is very much the same. Grenz when asked summarized Pannenberg’s theology as a notion of faith which is not a commission of knowing in addition to reason but it is grounded in mankind historical knowledge. Both theologians offer their interpretations of the Bible not by considering it a legend but by claiming its historicity and its accurateness.\r\nThe role of the gospel is also stressed by Escobar just like the other two theologians he approaches the issues by considering the word of honors first, the world and how the Scriptures apply to the issue. Theology mightiness not necessarily be dependent on the Bible but it tries to imply a need for knowledge and thought of God. Evangelicals and missionaries would be inconceivable without the Bible. Escobar argues that evangelicals must(prenominal) first acknowledge that they themselv es have a farsighted way to go in terms of deepen their understanding of biblical based mission work. In order to establish this as valid they must base it on sound biblical teachings.\r\nEscobar goes on to further state that theology history and the social science are useful as tools utilize for better understanding of God’s member and for contemporary mission work but provided God’s Word that is inspired and always able to renew the mission. Escobar relates theology to history as he correlates these to sciences which are substantially valid for providing apt arguments in regards to the existence or the non existence of God. numerous scientists disregard the Biblical truth as tangible fact and indeed are moreinclined to read the Scripture as fantasy instead of historical honest events. Evangelicals who are without adequate historical awareness or biblical training are subjected to making mistakes. He goes on to further emphasize that criticism must stand as t he instrument of correction. The most canonic convictions must remain a solid ground for evangelists and they must learn to embrace and sustain what is vital nature.\r\nWhen confronted with a setting that encompasses different cultures and we need to relate the Biblical truth in a way that is comprehensible and accurate for everyone we need to draw a line between what we think is valid and what individuals who are part of different cultures regard as such. We may stand solid for a certain group of individuals but it may not be relevant to a different group of people. It is with in this understanding that contextual theology is able to relate and the situation relates to the Bible being multi-cultural for all people. The Bible was written above culture and stands for everyone. In this sense working within a multi cultureal environment requires one to learn thourough knowledge of specific cultures while being untied to sugesstions and having the ability to realate those ideas to t raditional Biblical truths.\r\nReference:\r\nEscobar, S. (2002). â€Å"ever-changing Tides: Latin America and World Mission Today,”Orbis Books Escobar, S. (2011). â€Å"A Time for Mission: The Challenge\r\nfor Global Christianity,” InterVarsity electronic jamming\r\nFord, David F., ed. (1997). â€Å"The Modern Theologians: An Introduction to Christian theology in the twentieth century (2nd ed.)”. Malden, MA\r\nGrenz, S.J. (1988). â€Å"Wolfhart Pannenberg’s quest for untimate truth” Religion online. Retrieved August 20, 2014\r\nGrenz, S. J., & Olson, R. E. (1992). 20th-century theology: God and the world in a transitional age. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.\r\n'