'Death Poetry Essay\r'

'Is termination something to be feared when it may be considered the only aspect during bearing that is inevit adapted? Inte comfortingly, the verbalizers in two songs written by Emily Dickinson and Alan Seeger may non feel that this is the case. In Dickinson’s â€Å"The Chariot”, the feminine speaker compares giveing to demise as a chariot ride subtlety ending places she has been in her life, while the speaker in Seeger’s â€Å"I prevail a Rendezvous with finis” is a masculine speaker that is fictitious to be a soldier fighting in the war and experiencing many an(prenominal) close encounters with this morbid experience.\r\nBoth poems together give a light of acceptance of close into earth that generally has been taught to fear it, but in contrasting extremes. I will argue that clock quantify is the eventual(prenominal) factor that contributes to the acceptance of one’s passing away. This will be shown through the comparison of t he personas and literary devices in from each one poem, as Dickinson’s speaker, who has been deceased for centuries, in comparison to Seeger’s speaker, who is anticipating his demolition, have b shake off differences in the way they perceive death.\r\nPersonification is modishly employ in both poems to humanize death and differentiates the two poems because of the certain characteristics that each poet gives to Death as a character. In Dickinson’s poem, death is personified in a manner that makes Death an active element that is continuously a longside the speaker. The speaker consistently refers to Death as a partner, using the legers â€Å"we” and â€Å"us” in stanzas two through five. By utilizing avatar in this way, the speaker sets up the notion that death has been a long time partner of hers, not just an acquaintance, which indicates the length of time she must have spent with Death.\r\nThe collaboration between the speaker and death in this poem shows that she has an acceptance of death as her friend. Also, the speaker further attributes human characteristics much(prenominal) as forgivingness, and civility towards Death, which implies again the long amount of time she must have accompanied Death in order to know such details somewhat him, thus explaining why she is at ease with the whim of death. This is interest because the difference can be seen in Seeger’s avatar of Death.\r\nHuman qualities are shut away given to death, but done so in a way that would indicate that the speaker is assumed to be just getting to know Death, implying that the speaker is not yet dead. The speaker in this poem describes death as â€Å"tak[ing] my [speaker] hand And leading me[speaker]” (Seeger, 7-8), which produces the heart that Death is the one with authority. By giving fit to Death, the speaker seems uneasy and unsure of the situation. Is he to succumb to death or fight back?\r\nThis mechanically shows th at the time elapsed between the two characters birth is minimal, thus explaining his feeling of unsettlement towards death. This is made even to a greater extent clear when the speaker says that Death will retort him â€Å"into his dark lands and close my [speaker’s] eyes and quench my [speaker’s] breath,” (Seeger, 8-9). The prosopopoeia of Death in Seeger’s poem is such(prenominal) more morbid than in Dickinson’s and creates the whizz of hostility that can be related to to a negative first impression of another.\r\nIn this case, Seeger’s speaker has not had much time with Death, so again explaining why he feels uncomfortable with death. show here, the personification used in both poems gives an interesting way to establish time as a factor when considering the attitudes of each speaker towards death. While personification is used in these poems to humanize death and find on time, it also provides a deeper insight into the primal mo od that each poet is trying to convey, therefore it is required to further examine the tone in each poem.\r\nThrough the use of diction, both poets are able to create a tone that demonstrates and adds to their speaker’s boilersuit acceptance or rejection of death. As mentioned earlier, Dickinson uses such words such as â€Å"civility” and â€Å"kindness” to describe death which ultimately sets up a light tone when speaking of death. This is again related back to the easiness the speaker has with death, due to the long time for which she has been dead. Dickinson further uses the word â€Å"chariot” in the title, as well as referring to a â€Å" military capability” in the first stanza, which sets up an expectation that the poem will proceed slowly, which is true.\r\nThe slowness assists with the idea of time because being that poem is slowed down with the words used in combination with longer line lengths and enjambment, the overall sense that the speaker is in no rush and pass judgment of her circumstance is presented. The tone is quite bland and somewhat content as it seems that the speaker is accepting of her fate. Considering this with Seeger’s poem though, there are detectable shifts in tone due to specific word choices.\r\nInitially the tone of the poem is similar to that of Dickinson’s, as the most recurrent word throughout the poem, â€Å" meet”, sets a clear tone. This word choice is very important because the poet decided to use a kind term which one would assume is does out of rid will and shows the approval of a meeting with death. as yet as the poem continues on, other words rub down well to contradict this meaning. The tone begins to shift from the implied tone with the title, to the speaker commenting that they will have their rendezvous at â€Å"some disputed barricade” (Seeger, 2).\r\nThis automatically brings into nidus that the speaker must be someone who knows war, and specifically using the word â€Å"disputed” indicates some interlocking and a more harsh tone. Throughout the rest of the poem, word choice consistently changes setting lustrous and light moods to darker and heavier moods, demonstrated with the use of the word â€Å" deface” (Seeger, 12), but then contradicting it with nature and life alike(p) â€Å"apple-blossoms” ( Seeger, 4) for example. The many shifts in tone implies that the time of death is near for this.\r\n'