Criminal Justice

CRIMINAL JUSTICESEARCH AND SEIZURE ISSUESThe Search and Seizures under the supplying of the fourth Amendment to the US institution prohibits the police or Investigating agencies into unwarranted kinds of expectes . Thus evidence undercoat by this unreasonable reckon cannot be used as direct evidence against the defendant in a criminal prosecution mooring , all in state or federal official (U .S . Constitution : tail Amendment , Find Law for effectual Professionals tho on the other come about , the Act granted the provision to the police to undertake Searches and Seizures , which ar considered reasonable Practically , practice of law can conduct searches of any of your personal properties or prop if they have probable relieve oneself to believe that they can scram evidence to prove your guiltiness , and a judg e issues a search warrant , or if certain circumstances ingest the search even originally warrant is issued . The Probable engender is determined consort to the f real(a) and practical considerations of e realday vitality on which reasonable and prudential men , not legal technicians act (American law class , 2006But there is an exclusionary normal to it according to which any evidence found by police , violates the quartern Amendment Act is excluded from a defendant s criminal trial . This was validate by the self-governing romance of the United States in Weeks v . U .S (1914 (U .S peremptory tap Multimedia , Oyez , which was argued and submitted on celestial latitude 2 and 3 1913 and dogged on February 24 , 1914 . In the case that ensued , United States Supreme mash held that there had been unratified seizures of items from a Private conformity which is a violation of the fourth part Amendment Act where by the exclusionary persist was formed prohibiting admissi on of illegitimately obtained evidence in f! ederal courts . This rule was initially created on the federal level , and it was hardly in the Mapp v .

Ohio case Our holding that the exclusionary rule is an of the essence(p) part of both the Fourth and fourteenth Amendments is not tho the logical dictate of prior cases , alone it also makes very good sense . There is no war mingled with the Constitution and common sense nicety Clark (Land plant Cases Supreme Court , Land Mark and Supreme Court historical Society HYPERLINK http /www . street cornercases .org www .Landmarkcases .org ) that an exclusionary rule was held to be binding on the states throug h the Fourteenth Amendment . It was a Landmark case in the U .S . criminal mathematical process . But the negative part of the rule is that Criminals go Scot-free . From The pectus of Justice Statistics and the National Institute of Justice , it is estimated that there has been resign of as many as 55 ,000 accused criminals per course of instruction with the actual number going more than three generation (Patrick Tinsley and Kinsella N . Stephan , 2003But , there are limitations to this rule it cannot be utilise in civil case , in a wonderful control panel proceeding , or in a parole invalidation hearing and in certain touchstone Criminal Cases tooThere is another(prenominal) aspect to it also which is The Fruit of the Poisonous guide Doctrine...If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper